The Melanesian Institute for Pastoral and Socio-Economic Services
Melanesian
Institute

Melanesian Institute

Where culture meets action for a just future.

Launched Friday 7 August 2026 · Melanesian Institute, Goroka

What Papua New Guineans think about Sorcery Accusation Related Violence

Today’s launch brings the voices of Papua New Guineans directly into the national response to Sorcery Accusation-Related Violence. Conducted by the Melanesian Institute in May 2026, this first-of-its-kind nationwide survey gathered the views of 2,000 people across all 20 provinces, the Autonomous Region of Bougainville, and the National Capital District.

For the first time, policymakers have national evidence of what Papua New Guineans think about SARV, how deeply it affects communities, and what they expect the government to do. The headline message is unmistakable: although belief in sorcery remains widespread, Papua New Guineans overwhelmingly reject the violence that follows an accusation. They regard SARV as contrary to Christian teaching and Melanesian values, and they are demanding stronger government action to prevent violence, protect survivors, and hold perpetrators accountable.

Together, Let Us Listen, Learn, And Act to end Sorcery Accusation Related Violence

Key findings

  • 1 / 13

    The evidence gap, filled

    Policymakers in PNG have had no national data on public attitudes towards SARV to inform their policymaking — until now.

    • 2,000 people surveyed in May 2026
    • Every one of the 20 provinces, plus Bougainville and the National Capital District
    • Aged 18 to 86, roughly half women and half men, three quarters of them parents
    • Interviewed in Tok Pisin by mobile phone, with our partner Digicel
  • 2 / 13

    A careful note on definitions

    The survey drew three distinctions explicitly, and so does this summary.

    • Believing sorcery is real
    • Believing it is acceptable to accuse someone of sorcery
    • Believing it is acceptable to attack someone who has been accused
    • ‘SARV’ here never means belief in sorcery. It always means violence following an accusation.
  • 3 / 13

    Most Papua New Guineans believe in sorcery

    This is the fundamental difference our friends overseas need to recognise to understand the challenge SARV poses in PNG.

    • 68% personally believe sorcery exists and is real
    • 78% were taught growing up that sorcery exists and is real
  • 4 / 13

    Views are grounded in real experience

    SARV is not a distant or theoretical concern.

    • Most people say SARV sometimes happens in the community where they live
    • Many know somebody who has attacked a person accused of sorcery
    • Many know somebody who has had to move house because of SARV
  • 5 / 13

    Who gets accused

    The people accused of sorcery are both men and women, usually related to their accusers, mostly older — and almost always poor.

    • The five most likely triggers for an accusation:
    • 1. Unexplained death   2. Sudden illness   3. Dispute over land
    • 4. Problem with polygamy   5. Issue in the workplace
  • 6 / 13

    Papua New Guineans reject SARV

    Most people think SARV is immoral and violates Melanesian values. Almost everybody believes SARV is against Christian teaching.

    • Belief in sorcery is widespread. Support for the violence that follows an accusation is not.
  • 7 / 13

    But 1 in 7 still think SARV is legal

    A gap in legal awareness that costs lives.

    • 15% think, wrongly, that it is legal to accuse someone of sorcery
    • 14% think, wrongly, that it is legal to attack someone accused of sorcery
    • 3 in 4 say social media is their main source of news and information
  • 8 / 13

    The country wants this fixed

    Support for action is extremely high, right across the country.

    • 97% say it is important or very important that PNG addresses SARV effectively
    • 98% say the national government has a role in preventing SARV
    • 98% say it has a role in supporting survivors, and in securing justice against perpetrators
  • 9 / 13

    And it says government is not delivering

    Of those who say the government has a role to play:

    • 97% say it is playing its prevention role ‘not well’ or ‘not well at all’
    • 98% say the same of its support for survivors
    • 98% say the same of securing justice against perpetrators
  • 10 / 13

    What Papua New Guineans want done

    Asked what the government should do to tackle SARV, people said:

    • 99% Fund the SARV National Action Plan
    • 99% Public health awareness on the medical causes of illness and death
    • 99% Police-led rapid response teams in the worst-affected provinces
    • 98% Legal awareness work on the law on SARV
  • 11 / 13

    What Papua New Guineans want done

    … and:

    • 98% Teaching against SARV in the school curriculum
    • 90% More safehouses exclusively for SARV survivors
    • 90% Free medical treatment for survivors at every clinic and hospital
    • 86% Ban posting photos and videos of SARV on social media
  • 12 / 13

    People’s own suggestions

    Asked for any other ideas for tackling SARV more effectively, people suggested:

    • Enforce existing laws against SARV properly
    • Deploy more police in rural posts
    • Support churches to address SARV in remote communities
  • 13 / 13

    The conclusion

    We have long argued that SARV violates Papua New Guinean law, Melanesian values and Christian teaching. This survey shows, for the first time, that the vast majority of Papua New Guineans agree.

    • Now we all need our government’s backing to step up the fight against SARV.
    • It should start by publishing, funding and implementing the SARV National Action Plan.

Swipe, scroll sideways, or use the dots. Every figure is from the report.

What we are asking the Government to do

This launch calls upon the Government to:

  • publish, fund, and fully implement the revised National SARV Action Plan;
  • establish police-led rapid-response teams in provinces most affected by SARV;
  • strengthen law enforcement and legal awareness;
  • expand safe houses, healthcare, and protection for survivors;
  • promote public understanding of the medical causes of illness and death; and
  • integrate SARV prevention into school and community education.

Today’s presentation is a headline analysis, not the final comprehensive report. It highlights the most urgent and policy-relevant findings so that action does not have to wait.

The evidence is now before us. Papua New Guineans are not asking their leaders to solve the mystery of sorcery; they are asking them to stop the violence that follows an accusation. The Government must now turn this clear public mandate into funding, protection, justice, and measurable action.

Supported by the Australian Government through the Building Community Engagement in Papua New Guinea (BCEP) Program, part of the PNG–Australia Partnership.

Promoting cultural understanding and community progress

The Melanesian Institute in Papua New Guinea is a hub for intellectuals, researchers, and those working for positive change. The Institute conducts research, offers educational programs, and engages in social development initiatives, fostering interfaith dialogue and harmonious relations.

We serve churches, missionary societies and service institutions through research, publications, in-service trainings and culture-related courses for varying interest groups — including participatory community processes for grassroots communities.

Portrait of Bro. Martin Tnines, SVD
Bro. Martin Tnines, SVD
Executive Director, Melanesian Institute

Empowering grassroots communities for sustainable development

The Melanesian Institute has been serving the people of Papua New Guinea and beyond since 1969 in the areas of social research, publication and cultural orientation courses for church institutions, missionary societies, and interested individuals and organizations — local and overseas NGOs, researchers, foreign dignitaries and development workers, and government bodies. These core services have contributed greatly to nation building, missionary work and gutpela sindaun — fullness of life — for local communities.

However, these services have remained limited to expatriate communities and the few Papua New Guineans who can read and write. The Institute has not reached most Papua New Guineans living in remote communities with low levels of literacy. So how do we reach those communities? How do they become active participants rather than recipients? How can our services bring about social transformation, and be sustained at grassroots level? How can grassroots communities become catalysts of genuine change and drivers of their own development, right in their own backyards?

The Institute believes it is within its capacity and institutional mandate to deliver a fourth service that supplements and consolidates the other three, and that can address these collectively discerned questions. That emerging service is Participatory Processes for Grassroots Communities.

Calling all writers. Share your expertise with the Institute — Catalyst is accepting original and insightful articles.

How to submit